Comparison, updated 4 November 2026

Best tools to turn a GitHub repository into an architecture diagram

Reading an unfamiliar repository is slow. A generated diagram will not replace reading the code, but it gets you a map in a minute. The tools below read a GitHub repository and draw it; they differ in whether the result is editable, whether private repos work, and what you can do with the diagram afterwards.

We make Archreactor, one of the tools listed. Competitor facts come from each vendor's own page on 4 November 2026. Generated diagrams from any of these tools can be wrong, so check them against the code before you rely on them.

The tools, compared

1

GitDiagram

Best for a quick look at a public repo

Anyone who wants a quick picture of a public GitHub repository, no account needed.

Strengths

  • Paste a public repo URL and get a diagram quickly
  • Free and simple
  • Open source

Limits

  • One-shot output: a diagram to look at rather than an editable, shareable workspace
  • Aimed at public repositories
  • No walkthrough, levels or presentation export

Pricing. Free to use at the time of writing; see the site.

2

DeepWiki

Best for reading docs about a repo, with diagrams

Developers who want to read generated documentation, with diagrams, about an unfamiliar repository.

Strengths

  • Generates a browsable wiki for a repository, with architecture diagrams inside the docs
  • Lets you ask questions about the code
  • From the team behind Devin

Limits

  • Documentation first: diagrams are part of a wiki page, not an editor
  • You cannot reshape the diagram or present it
  • Output is generated, so check it against the code

Pricing. Free for public repositories at the time of writing; see the site.

3

Archreactor

Best for an editable diagram you can present and share

People who need to explain a system: presales, onboarding, design reviews, interview prep.

Strengths

  • Draws from a plain description or a GitHub repo, then plays each request through the diagram step by step
  • Business, Solution and Technical views of one diagram
  • Exports PNG, PowerPoint (Pro) and MP4 (Pro), or share a link
  • Free plan with no card: 25 AI credits a month and 3 GitHub imports a month

Limits

  • Real-time multi-user editing is planned, not shipped
  • No diagram-as-code editor
  • A young product with a small integration list

Pricing. Free; Starter $10/month; Pro $19/month per editor; Team $49/user/month (paid plans are not yet open for purchase).

4

Eraser

Best if you already work in Eraser

Engineering teams that want diagrams and docs in one workspace, written as code or drawn.

Strengths

  • Diagram-as-code and a canvas side by side
  • AI diagrams and AI documents on every plan
  • Real-time collaboration and comments, unlimited guests
  • Notion, Confluence and VS Code integrations
  • Many diagram types (sequence, flowchart, ERD, data flow, cloud, C4, BPMN), an MCP server, SOC 2 Type 2 and SAML SSO

Limits

  • Free plan is 3 files and 3 AI credits
  • GitHub integration needs the Business plan or higher
  • Its interactive explainers are not the same as playing one request step by step through a diagram

Pricing. Free; Business $45 per member per month billed annually ($60 monthly); Business Plus $42 per member (10 seat minimum); Enterprise custom. Source: eraser.io/pricing.

Which should I pick?

For a throwaway look at a public repo, GitDiagram is the quickest. To read about a codebase, DeepWiki. To end up with a diagram you can edit, present as a walkthrough and share, use Archreactor (public or private repos; the free plan includes 3 imports a month). If your team already uses Eraser with GitHub, stay there.

What a generated diagram cannot do

It shows structure the model could infer from files. It will miss runtime behaviour, infrastructure defined outside the repo and anything the team never wrote down. Treat it as a first draft, then correct it.

Try Archreactor on your own system

Free, no card. Describe a system or import a repo and see the diagram in about a minute.

Start free

More comparisons

We make Archreactor. Competitor details were read from each vendor's own pages on 4 November 2026 and can change; follow the links for current plans. Spot an error? Tell us on the contact page and we will fix it.